“Man is by nature a political animal.”
~Aristotle
Politics rule every aspect of our lives, but not politics as you may think of them
“Politics is a blood sport.”
~Aneurin Bevan
There is always a winner and a loser in politics, never a tie, never a middle ground, someone always ends up battered and bruised
“Although he’s regularly asked to do so, God does not take sides in American politics. “
~George J. Mitchell
While there are politics in religion, religion has no role in politics
“An empty stomach is not a good political adviser. “
~Albert Einstein
One should never base their stance on what they crave, rather what they are willing to achieve
A Philosopher, a Politician, a Pundit and a Physicist. An interesting collection to say the least. Normally these four men are not thought of as contemporaries, at least not in a grouping that is. However each one is brilliant in their own right and has impacted countless people in countless ways. For me the words, and in some cases far more than that, of these four men have impacted me both personally, as well as in the formation and continual evolution of my politics. To some extent I believe that expounding upon their words and actions can have a direct role in our creation of the better world they all worked for if only we were to take them to heart and put them into action. If people would just take the time, look around themselves, make the effort to change what they see wrong with society this world would be a far better place. Unfortunately all too often complacency and apathy reign supreme. The individual has lost faith in their ability to enact meaningful change. They are taught strength only comes in numbers, that standing alone is bad, is somehow wrong. Independent thought is never wrong as long as it is used for the execution of good. Not good for the individual, good for humanity, for society, for all. So what can we take from these words? What can we learn from these men? There are many possible interpretations, what follows are mine…

Aristotle
“Man is by nature a political animal.”
~Aristotle
Politics is life, literally. It surrounds us, encompasses every aspect of our lives. We encounter and/or are immersed in political situations every single day. However for my statement to make sense one must first expand their understanding of what politics means in the context I use. I am not referring to politics in the framework of our government, rather I use it to describe how we interact as a unit with others. Whether it be a family, professional, educational, religious, or a societal unit, it doesn’t matter. When Aristotle speaks of man being a political animal, I take that to describe the aforementioned interactions which take place within a specific group of people. The problem lies in the fact that the majority of society is under the belief that politics does not apply to them unless they are casting a ballot, which unfortunately leads them to the belief that they are unqualified to comment or take action in regards to politics at a higher level. This attitude has to change. People need to take what they have learned in their everyday lives and begin to apply it to bigger and better things. We need to use our individual skills and talents to influence those who make the policies which affect us all. Until we do, we will continue down the same broken road which has led us to where we are now.

Aneurin Bevan
“Politics is a blood sport.”
~Aneurin Bevan
Building on what I discussed in my analysis of the previous quote, it is clear to see how Bevan’s words are applicable to our interactions if one examines the quote, rather than taking it at face value. The phrase blood sport calls to mind an image of intense fighting with the single-minded goal of victory over ones opposition, a take no prisoners mentality. I then think, how often do we see this in society, in business, in our lives? Our students exhibit this in their chase for valedictorian, our athletes in their quest for the top of the podium. Humans are competitive animals no buts about it. However how we manifest this competitiveness is what defines us as an individual. Competitiveness is a good thing, for without it there is no challenge, without challenge there is no growth, without growth we simply stagnate, wither, and eventually die. It bothers me to no end to see how many segments in society have deemed competition to be bad. Rather those segments believe that fairness should trump all. These are the same people who hand out ribbons for participation instead of accomplishment, deem letter grades mean, think dodge ball is bullying and feel that merit plays no role in success. Yet these same people have no qualms about playing dirty and fighting tooth and nail when their narrow views are challenged. Normal? Not really. Hypocritical? Most definitely. They fail to see that competition is fair, it is rewarding the best for being the best. Competition is necessary if our society is to survive, to thrive. Politics is a blood sport, at all levels, however by pretending competition is bad we are hindering those who will eventually compete in our names, we are creating a populace which cannot win, cannot thrive, cannot prosper.

George J. Mitchell
“Although he’s regularly asked to do so, God does not take sides in American politics. “
~George J. Mitchell
As I stated earlier in this post, religion has no place in politics, although politics is an inherent part of religion. While that may seem illogical to many, it really isn’t. Religion by definition is the service to and worship of a god, deity or other supernatural entity. Where religion has laws, tenets, dogmas, etc… politics has no deity to be worshiped and revered. As you can see the quote is pretty much spot on once you take the time to look at it with an open and rational mind. Unfortunately in today’s political and religious arenas, a rational mind seems to be the exception rather than the rule. We have politicos who try to let religion influence the rule of law, while we have politics invading our religious communities, influencing entire societal units to vote as a collective rather than an individuals. Neither is right, and both are extremely dangerous when taken to the extremes they all to often are. People need to understand that politics, at least in the majority of the western world, America included, are based in logic and reason, where compromise is a necessity, not a luxury. Whereas in religion, it is more along the lines of a dictatorship, what the leader of the flock says is law, whether it be God, Mohammad, or another deity. The ultimate goal of religion is to create a community of individuals with shared values, morals, and beliefs. Politics is all about giving the individual the structure needed to achieve their goals whether they be religious or secular. Unfortunately, far too many try to use their religious morals to influence the structure created through politics, which cannot be successful simply due to the fact that morality is subjective to the individual and their fellow believers. What is moral to one is not always moral to another. People need to stop confusing what is legally right and wrong with what is morally right and wrong. Contrary to popular belief they are not one and the same. Legalities can be legislated, morality cannot be.

Albert Einstein
“An empty stomach is not a good political adviser. “
~Albert Einstein
You often hear something described as stunning in its simplicity. That is precisely how I feel about this particular quotation from Einstein. However, I feel it is deceptive in its simplicity as well. There are so many inferences which can be taken from these nine simple words, so many lessons, so many truths about society. The most obvious intention being conveyed is one that jealously should never be the deciding factor when making a decision, a choice about ones future. Unfortunately in today society, envy and resentment are more often than not the driving factor behind the choices the individual makes. They allow their craving for what they believe another to possess manipulate them into a position dictated by the party. It saddens me that the individual lets the collective tell them that they are not qualified to reach the same heights as another without it being legislated into being. That they are somehow not good enough to succeed on their own, that they need to be handed an advantage over their equal simply because the government does not believe they are capable in their own right. Some may have a harder road to success than others, but we all have a road if we choose to take it. Letting the actions of others hold us back is nothing more than a weak excuse for laziness. Personal responsibility and accountability are NOT bad, they are the building blocks of success. Adversity makes us stronger if we choose to allow it to. Or we can be lazy and allow it to destroy our dreams. The choice is up to the individual no matter what any politician tries to tell you.
As I have shown with each of my analyses, power is in the hands of the individual, we can manifest the change we desire. We are not weak, we are not powerless. There are no limits to what we can accomplish if we put our nose to the grindstone, work together and fight for what we believe in. The question is, have people had enough of being used, manipulated, and controlled by others to throw off the shackles, put aside their preconceived bias, and work as one for the common good? Is a better world worth it to you?